Arcjet vs WebDecoy: Why Application-Layer Bot Protection Falls Short

When evaluating bot protection solutions, many teams initially choose application-layer tools like Arcjet because they’re easy to integrate. But there’s a critical architectural flaw that limits their effectiveness against sophisticated scrapers and attackers. Let’s explore why.

The Fundamental Problem with Application-Layer Protection

Arcjet operates through an SDK that integrates directly into your application code. While this approach seems convenient, it has a critical limitation: the bot request has already been received and is consuming your server resources by the time Arcjet can make a decision.

How Arcjet’s Request Flow Works

When a bot makes a request to your application:

1. Bot sends request → Your server receives it
2. Your code runs → Application processes the request
3. SDK called → aj.protect() is invoked
4. Decision made → Arcjet analyzes the request
5. Response sent → You return a 403 Forbidden response
6. Bot ignores it → The bot has already succeeded

By the time Arcjet returns its decision, the damage is already done.

What the Bot Has Already Accomplished

By the time your application calls aj.protect(), the bot has:

• ✗ Consumed your server resources (CPU, memory, bandwidth)
• ✗ Potentially accessed requested content (depending on where you place the check)
• ✗ Added to your infrastructure costs
• ✗ Logged your application’s response headers and behavior
• ✗ Gathered information about your API structure

The Real-World Impact

Let’s say you have an e-commerce site with product catalog pages. A scraper makes 10,000 requests per day:

With Arcjet:

• Every request hits your application server
• Every request consumes resources (database queries, rendering, memory)
• Arcjet analyzes 10,000 requests and denies them
• Your costs have already been incurred

The scraper’s perspective:

• Gets 403 errors from your API
• Simply rotates IP addresses
• Changes User-Agent strings
• Uses distributed proxy networks
• Returns tomorrow with new tactics

Arcjet adds a “speed bump,” but doesn’t actually prevent the scraping—it just makes your servers work harder while processing requests you ultimately reject.

Why Bots Easily Bypass Arcjet

Arcjet relies on fingerprinting and pattern analysis to identify bots. But bots can:

1. Rotate IP addresses - Arcjet’s IP-based blocking is easily circumvented
2. Spoof headers - Modify User-Agent, Accept-Language, Referer strings
3. Mimic human behavior - Add delays between requests, randomize patterns
4. Use residential proxies - Route traffic through real user IP addresses
5. Distribute requests - Spread traffic across thousands of IPs

More fundamentally, Arcjet can only block after your server has already done the work.

Where Network-Layer Protection Wins

Traditional WAFs and CDN-based protections (Cloudflare, Akamai) address this by intercepting traffic before it reaches your origin:

• ✓ Block at the network edge (no server processing)
• ✓ Drop connections before your infrastructure is involved
• ✓ Don’t require application code execution
• ✓ Scale across multiple data centers
• ✓ Protect all applications simultaneously

But most organizations don’t have enterprise WAF budgets. This is where WebDecoy’s approach becomes powerful.

How WebDecoy Solves This: Honeypot-Based Detection

WebDecoy takes a fundamentally different approach that combines the best of application-layer visibility with network-level efficiency:

1. Honeypot Links - Detect Before Scraping

WebDecoy injects invisible links into your HTML that:

• Only bots would follow (humans can’t see them)
• Don’t exist in your sitemap
• Immediately flag visitors as automated threats

When a bot crawls your honeypot link, you know exactly which visitor is a scraper—before they access your real content.

Advantage over Arcjet: You identify scrapers on first contact, before they’ve consumed significant resources.

2. Decoy Endpoints - Waste Bot Resources, Not Yours

Instead of letting bots hit your real API endpoints, WebDecoy serves them fake ones:

Real endpoint: /api/v1/users
Decoy endpoint: /api/v1/admin-login

When bots probe for vulnerabilities:

• They find the decoy endpoints
• They waste time and resources investigating fake APIs
• Your real infrastructure remains protected
• You gain intelligence on attack patterns

Advantage over Arcjet: Bots are redirected to honeypots that consume their bandwidth, not yours.

3. Native SIEM Integration - Network-Level Response

WebDecoy’s biggest advantage: it’s not just telling your application to deny a request—it’s feeding bot detection events directly into your SIEM and security infrastructure:

• Immediate IP blocking at the firewall level
• Geographic blocking for suspicious regions
• Rate limiting at the network edge
• Automatic WAF rule updates

This means bots are blocked before future requests ever reach your servers.

Advantage over Arcjet: Your entire security stack can respond in real-time, not just your application.

The Economics: Total Cost of Ownership

Arcjet Model

• Pay for every request processed by your servers
• 10,000 bot requests/day = 10,000 server responses
• Higher infrastructure costs
• More data transfer
• Longer response times under bot attack

WebDecoy Model

• Pay once per domain/detection capacity
• Bot requests identified and redirected before reaching your servers
• Lower infrastructure costs
• Flat pricing (no per-request charges)
• Faster response times (bots waste their own resources)

For high-traffic sites, WebDecoy’s flat-rate model becomes dramatically more cost-effective.

Arcjet’s Own Admission

Arcjet acknowledges this limitation in their documentation, stating: “It’s impossible to create a system that can block all bots” and recommends combining bot protection with rate limiting to minimize impact.

But this is exactly the problem—you’re left implementing multiple layers of protection, each adding complexity and cost.

Real-World Comparison

When to Use Arcjet

Arcjet is appropriate if:

• You have a small, internal API
• Bot traffic is minimal (< 1% of requests)
• You want lightweight, code-level protection
• Your infrastructure already handles high load
• You prefer developer-first tools

When WebDecoy is the Right Choice

WebDecoy excels when:

• You’re facing active web scraping campaigns
• Content protection is critical (competitor intelligence, pricing, exclusive data)
• You want to minimize infrastructure costs
• You need network-level enforcement
• You require SIEM integration and audit trails
• You’re protecting multiple properties/domains

The Verdict

Arcjet is a speed bump. WebDecoy is a barrier.

Arcjet makes scraping slightly harder and more detectable, but it doesn’t actually prevent determined bots from accessing your content. The request has already reached your servers, consumed your resources, and potentially retrieved data.

WebDecoy prevents bots from reaching your real content in the first place by:

• Identifying them through honeypots before they cause damage
• Redirecting them to decoys that waste their resources
• Integrating with your entire security stack
• Providing network-level enforcement

For organizations serious about content protection and infrastructure efficiency, honeypot-based detection with SIEM integration isn’t just better—it’s the only approach that actually prevents scraping rather than just responding to it.

Next Steps

Ready to protect your content from sophisticated bots?

• Compare all bot detection solutions
• Try WebDecoy free - Start detecting bots in < 1 hour
• See the implementation guide - Technical deep dive

Share this post

Like this post? Share it with your friends!

• Share on Facebook, opens in a new tab
• Share on Twitter, opens in a new tab
• Share on LinkedIn, opens in a new tab